Legal Opinion

Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Nash

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1985No. 00161PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal taken from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, denying defendant’s-appellant’s 1 (Livingston Nash) motion for summary judgment on his counterclaim and granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Industrial Valley Bank and Trust Company.

The facts are as follows: In 1978, Livingston and Hyalene Nash decided to trade in their 1975 Ford automobile for another car. Oak Lane Ford, Inc., apparently had the car they were looking for and on November 29, 1978, they purchased a used 1976 Chevrolet four door Caprice for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Associates Discount Corporation v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. Alliance Discount Corp. v. ShawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Savoy v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Millersville Annexation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Richland School District v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Koresko v. Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Koresko)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Coy v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Reid v. Citadel Financial Credit Union (In Re Reid)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API