Groshans v. Dairyland Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
Plaintiffs Karl Groshans, Jr., and Lisa Groshans filed suit against defendant Dairyland Insurance Company (Dairyland) seeking a declaratory judgment that they are entitled to coverage under their Dairyland policy for a hit-and-run accident in which no contact was made between the vehicles. The court granted Dairyland’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse and hold that when a hit-and-run accident occurs there need be no physical contact between another vehicle and an insured’s vehicle in order for an insured to recover, absent specific language in a policy requiring such contact.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ferega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Container Corp. of America v. WagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Allsteel, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Smagala v. OwenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. PritchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Otto v. Country Mutual Ins. Co, 07ap-227 (3-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. BenedettoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. BochenekAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. BochenekAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.