Legal Opinion

Groshans v. Dairyland Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 25, 2000No. 3-99-0382PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

Plaintiffs Karl Groshans, Jr., and Lisa Groshans filed suit against defendant Dairyland Insurance Company (Dairyland) seeking a declaratory judgment that they are entitled to coverage under their Dairyland policy for a hit-and-run accident in which no contact was made between the vehicles. The court granted Dairyland’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse and hold that when a hit-and-run accident occurs there need be no physical contact between another vehicle and an insured’s vehicle in order for an insured to recover, absent specific language in a policy requiring such contact.

FACTS

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ferega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Container Corp. of America v. WagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Allsteel, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Smagala v. OwenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Insurance Company v. PritchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Otto v. Country Mutual Ins. Co, 07ap-227 (3-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. BenedettoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. BochenekAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. BochenekAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API