Legal Opinion

Ferega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1974No. 46383PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

Section 143a of the Illinois Insurance Code requires that all policies of automobile liability insurance include coverage in amounts specified in the Illinois Vehicle Code “for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles and hit-and-run motor vehicles ***.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 73, par. 755a.) The policy of insurance issued by the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, to the plaintiff, Stephen C. Ferega, contains an uninsured motorist clause in which the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Olympic Hotel Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ferega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. YapejianIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AbramowiczSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Soule v. Stuyvesant InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API