Legal Opinion

People v. Quiroz

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 2011No. E051131PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Zachary Joseph Quiroz appeals from his conviction of burglary of a vehicle. (Pen. Code,1 § 459.) He contends the probation condition requiring him to “[s]ubmit a record of income and expenditures to the Probation Officer as directed” is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and is unauthorized by statute. We disagree, and we affirm.

H. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged in a complaint with three counts of burglary of a vehicle. (§ 459.) On May 17, 2010, he pleaded guilty to one count, and the other two counts were dismissed.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. GuillenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. Kevin F.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Bloomfield, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API