C & D INVESTMENTS v. Beaudoin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Respondent C & D Investments (C & D), in a declaratory judgment action, sought to enjoin appellant Loren H. Beaudoin from foreclosing. a mortgage on respondent’s property and to have the mortgage set aside. The trial court granted judgment in favor of C & D, determining that' the consideration for the obligation underlying the mortgage had failed and that Beaudoin had breached the parties’ agreement to exhaust other collateral before foreclosing on the mortgage. We reverse.
FACTS
This case arises from a complicated loan and guarantee transaction involving David Johnson and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Estrada v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Overholt Crop Insurance Service Co. v. BredesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Thomsen v. Famous Dave's of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Travelers Insurance v. Westridge Mall Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Chalmers v. KanawyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.