Legal Opinion

Hafeman v. Gem Oil Company

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1956No. 34017, 34018, 34023PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This action seeks a determination and adjudication of the rights of the parties to royalty of the landowner payable by the terms of the base oil and gas lease of two noncontiguous quarter sections of real estate owned by Arthur H. Hafeman, an accounting of the royalty he claims is due him because of the production of oil from the land, a judgment in his favor for the amount thereof, and general equitable relief.

The parties are numerous and will, when appropriate, be designated herein as follows: Arthur H. Hafeman, plaintiff in the district court, as appellee; and the defendants in that court,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Ledwith v. Bankers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Unioil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Conway v. ConwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Mullendore v. SCH. D. NO. 1 OF LANCASTER CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge INebraska Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API