Legal Opinion
Guinnane v. San Francisco City Planning Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1989No. A040760PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
In this administrative mandamus proceeding, plaintiff and appellant challenges the underlying decisions of defendants and respondents San Francisco City Planning Commission and Board of Permit
Appeals denying a building permit to construct a four-story, six thousand square-foot house with five bedrooms, five baths, and parking for two cars. We affirm for the reasons which we explain.
Procedural History
This is the second occasion in which plaintiff Roy Guinnane has appeared before this court concerning the subject property. In the earlier action prosecuted under a theory…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John Gamble Fie A. Gamble Life Care Residences, Inc., Doing Business as Oak Hill Residential Care v. City of EscondidoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Desmond v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Bowman v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Saad v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.