Bowman v. City of Berkeley
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAY, P. J.
Marie Bowman et al., as individuals and on behalf of Neighbors for Sensible Development for 2517 Sacramento Street (collectively the Neighbors), appeal from the judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate to overturn the resolution of the City of Berkeley (the City) authorizing Affordable Housing Associates (the Developer) to construct a housing complex for senior citizens (the Project). The Neighbors contend that the City erred under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) 1 in adopting a mitigated negative declaration…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- The Pocket Protectors v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Preserve Poway v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.