Legal Opinion

Scherrer v. Foster

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided May 8, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves to remand to the state court. The' motion is submitted upon the declaration and the verified petition to remove. The declaration alleges in the first count “that the defendants employed the plaintiff to aid in raising the wheels of a tractor by means of jaekserews and directed the plaintiff to adjust the jaekscrew under; the axle; * * 5 that the defendants, by A. J. Foster, then and there the agent of the said International Harvester Company, 5' c ® without notice or warning to plaintiff, negligently and carelessly wrenched said jaekscrew with a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Gustafson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowery v. ZornLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Sklarsky v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  3. Genuine Panama Hat Works, Inc. v. WebbDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  4. Jennings v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1930
  5. Tinney v. McClainDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API