Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Southern Ry. Co.

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided May 8, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLENN, District Judge.

This action was instituted in the court of common pleas for Sumter county, and, in accordance with the federal statutes applicable, it was removed into this court by a petition of the defendant, Southern Railway Company.

The complaint states two causes of action, the first of which alleges in substance that the defendants prepared, and at the time of the preparation published in the presence of John Riddle, S. C. Cope, B. L. Martin, and J. R. Quattlebaum, a certain statement, which was signed and executed by one of the defendants, Tucker, and prepared or written by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Kern v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Theresa Stieberger v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Nettles v. RhettDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1936
  3. Spriggs v. Associated PressDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1944
  4. Johnson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1938
  5. Bagwell v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API