Legal Opinion

Genuine Panama Hat Works, Inc. v. Webb

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 24, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The motion to remand is denied. The plaintiff is a corporation of the state of New York. The Concordia Fire Insurance Company of Milwaukee is a corporation of the state of Wisconsin. The Royal Insurance Company, Limited, of Liverpool, is a corporation existing under the laws of Great Britain. The defendant Webb, who is now alleged by the plaintiff to be the agent of each of the defendant insurance companies above named, is a citizen and resident of the state of New York.

When the plaintiff first brought this action in the New York Supreme Court for New York County, on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Mulchey v. Methodist Religious SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Parks v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Pangburn v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Discount Corp. v. O'MellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. Norwalk v. Air-Way Electric Appliance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Sklarsky v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Scott Paper Company v. Fort Howard Paper CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  5. Sewell v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API