Murray v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
Appellant Donald Murray’s wrists broke out in hives shortly after he drew a sample of raw gas .as part of his job activities. When the Workers’ Compensation Division denied Murray’s claim for benefits, a contested case hearing was held to determine whether his injury was work-related. The hearing examiner held that Murray’s inability to identify the precise chemical which caused his skin problem constituted failure to prove a com-pensable injury as a matter of law. We find that Murray’s inability to identify the specific source of his rash does not preclude a finding of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. GarlWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Guerrero v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Stevens v. State Ex Rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Frazier v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Joseph O. Hayes v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.