Legal Opinion

Comins v. Sharkansky

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 9, 1995No. 93-P-1502PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The primary question raised by this appeal is whether the defendant-accountant, chosen under a court approved settlement agreement to make an appraisal of stock *38binding on the parties, is entitled to absolute immunity as a quasi judicial officer. We hold that he is not.

In settlement of a petition for an accounting brought in the Probate Court by the mother, as guardian of her daughter, Chloe,1 against the father who was the custodian of Chloe’s shares in Clo Corporation (Clo), the parties executed a “Stock Purchase Agreement.” The agreement was subsequently approved by the Probate Court and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Home Owners Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Northwestern Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Haglund v. Philip Morris Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. In re the Enforcement of a SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Carlson v. MayerMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012
  5. George MacKie v. Katrin Rouse-Weir / George MacKie v. Robert JossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API