Legal Opinion

Jordan v. City of Evansville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1904No. 20,310PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Vanderburgh Circuit Court; L. O. Ilasch, Judge. Action by the city of Evansville against Fred L. Jordan to recover a penalty for the violation of an ordinance of such city requiring persons engaged in the sale of intoxicating liquors within four miles of the corporate limits of such city to take out a city license. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $50, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was commenced in the police court of the city of Evansville against appellant to recover a penalty for the violation of an ordinance of the city requiring a license to retail intoxicating liquors -within four miles of the corporate limits. A trial of said cause resulted in a finding and judgment in favor of appellee. From this judgment appellant appealed to the court below, where he was again convicted.

*513The statute authorizing appellee to pass the ordinance under which appellant was convicted reads as follows: “The common council shall have power to enact ordinances for the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. GiannouliasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. McClanahan v. BreedingIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API