Legal Opinion

Major Clients Agency v. Diemer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1998No. B106486PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J. *

This appeal is from the judgment of dismissal in favor of the respondent entered on July 25, 1996, following the trial court’s order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm.

A. Factual and Procedural Background

Writer-producer Jeff Franklin (hereinafter Franklin) hired appellant Major Clients Agency (hereinafter Major Clients) as his agent, to negotiate a contract between himself as writer-producer and Lorimar Productions, Inc. (hereinafter Lorimar). Franklin also hired an attorney, respondent John Diemer (hereinafter Diemer). Diemer was not hired as Major…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Leko v. Cornerstone Bldg. Inspection Serv.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Giacometti v. Aulla, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. KROLL & TRACK v. Paris & ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Kroll & Tract v. Paris & ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API