Legal Opinion

People v. Buchanan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1929No. Docket Nos. 114, 115, 77PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

In the above-entitled cases the defendants respectively received sentences imposing fines or imprisonment for the possession of intoxicating liquors, and also were sentenced for either the sale or transportation of the same liquor under circumstances which they make the basis of their claim that they are being doubly punished for one offense.

In the Buchanan case the evidence shows that the defendant drove into the garage on the place of his residence and he was seen there, after an interval, with a brown box in his hands. Shortly thereafter he drove away and was arrested, a box similar in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re ChausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. MazzolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. KrupaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. People v. TwedtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. Von LattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. BeggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API