Legal Opinion
Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd. v. Sullivan
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided November 13, 2008No. 14-07-01042-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JEFF BROWN, Justice.
After the ad valorem tax payment owed by Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd., was returned as undeliverable for insufficient postage, appellee Bill Sullivan — in his capacity as Grimes County tax collector— marked Tenaska’s payment as delinquent and assessed $159,158.66 in penalties and interest. The trial court upheld the assessment by summary judgment, and Te-naska appealed. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Tenaska owns real property in Grimes County that is subject to ad valorem taxation. On January 30, 2006, Tenaska attempted to pay its 2005 taxes by mailing a check in the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robertson v. Odom, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Tolar v. ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYD'S CO.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
- National Union Fire Insurance v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Amerigroup Texas, Inc. v. True View Surgery Center, L.P., D/B/A Town Park Surgery Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.