Legal Opinion

Bean v. H.E. Sargent, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The defendant-employers in these consolidated cases, H.E. Sargent, Inc. and Diamond International Corporation, appeal from the decisions of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming the decisions of a commissioner that the lump sum posthumous awards of permanent impairment benefits to the estates of employees Herbert Bean and Albert Lonko were not barred by the provisions of 39 M.R.S.A. § 60 (1978). We affirm the decisions.

I

Each of the employees sustained a work-related injury that was compensated pursuant to an agreement with his employer duly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  2. Bouford v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Campbell v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dumond v. Aroostook Van LinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Delorge v. NKL Tanning, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. King v. Bangor Federal Credit UnionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Violette v. Leo Violette & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Webber v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API