Legal Opinion

Howard Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Director of Division of Employment Security

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 16, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

These are appeals under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 151A, § 42, as last previously amended by St. 1951, c. 763, § 181 from decisions of a judge of the Central District Court of Worcester which sustained decisions of the board of review granting benefits respectively to two groups of claimants under the employment security law. The facts, which are substantially the same in each case, are established by the decisions of the board.2 No contention is made that they were not supported by evidence. Our duty is to determine what final decision is required on the facts found. §42.

The pertinent facts are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moen v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Yellow Cab Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Milne Chair Co. v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Olechnicky v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Streeter v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Still v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Lamont v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. General Electric Co. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. In re the Claim of HeitzenraterNew York Court of Appeals · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API