Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Vicuna

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 28, 2001No. 00-2051PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Richard Rogers appeals from the summary disposition of his federal and state law claims against the United States, IRS agents Sophia Vicuna and Thomas Kil-martin, and Northborough, Massachusetts, police officers Sergeant Thomas Martin, Sergeant Michael Edmonds and Officer Frederick Perry. Finding no error, we affirm.

I

The facts of this case are straightforward. On March 5, 1998, Agents Vicuna and Kilmartin arrived at Rogers’s home to seize his two vehicles pursuant to a levy. Rogers, a resident of Northborough, Massachusetts, had been involved with the IRS in a dispute…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. National Commodity & Barter Ass'n, National Commodity Exchange v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. HenselCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert JubicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Wojcik v. Massachusettts State Lottery CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Rosario v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  5. Meuse v. PaneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API