United States v. Alfred Leotis Rodgers, United States of America v. Michael Reed Rodgers
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Alfred Leotis Rodgers and Michael Reed Rodgers appeal their criminal convictions, contending that the district court 1 erred in denying their motions to dismiss, in which they asserted double jeopardy and prosecuto-rial vindictiveness. Additionally, Michael contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to sever, and Alfred contends that the district court erred in failing to sustain his objections to the presentence investigation report (PSR). We affirm.
I. Background
In March of 1992, the government charged Alfred Rodgers, Michael Rodgers, and six others in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. John Monroe Kime, Also Known as Jack Kime, United States of America v. Randall Kirk BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Marlon Watford, A/K/A Tony Vallie and Ronnie RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Kenneth JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.