Legal Opinion

In Re JM

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 12, 1993No. 92-106Published

1Opinion of the Court

624 A.2d 362 (1993)

In re J.M., Juvenile.

No. 92-106.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

March 12, 1993.

Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Atty. Gen., Montpelier, and Michael O. Duane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Waterbury, for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert Paolini of Martin & Paolini, P.C., Barre, for defendants-appellants.

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY and JOHNSON, JJ.

ALLEN, Chief Justice.

The parents of J.M., a juvenile, appeal the termination of their residual parental rights, arguing that the family court failed to apply the proper legal test in concluding that their progress toward reunification with their daughter had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. In re L.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. In re J.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. In re R.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API