In re J.M.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
The parents of J.M., a juvenile, appeal the termination of their residual parental rights, arguing that the family court failed to apply the proper legal test in concluding that their progress toward reunification with their daughter had stagnated and that they would not be able to resume custody within a reasonable time. The parents also contend that there was no clear and convincing proof that the best interests of the child under 33 V.S.A. § 5540 required termination. We affirm.
J.M. and her two siblings were placed in the legal custody of the Commissioner of Social and Rehabilitation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re L.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re R.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In re J.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In re D.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re T.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- In re A.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.