Legal Opinion
In re H.A.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 26, 1990No. 88-199PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
The parents of H.A., an eleven-year-old girl, individually appeal the March 16,-1988 order of the district court terminating the residual parental rights of both parents. We affirm.
The history of this case dates back to March 12, 1984, when the state’s attorney first filed a petition pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 645(a) alleging that H.A. was a child in need of care and supervision (CHINS). A merits hearing was held on March 23, 1984, and the court concluded, based on a stipulation by the parties, *506that H.A. was a CHINS. Following the disposition hearing on May 2, 1984, the court transferred legal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In re R.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In Re J. & J. W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- In re D. P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- In re A. D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re J.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In re B.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In re B.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Vermont Women's Health Center v. Operation RescueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.