Prussing v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam;.
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether the common law should be changed to preclude an employer from terminating long-term employment without cause even though the employment is at will or the contract of employment otherwise provides. It now appears that we cannot reach that issue.
Prussing first went to work for General Motors when he was 23. At the termination of his employment he had an executive position with General Motors Overseas Operations in New York City. In 1974, at the age of 52, he was discharged when he refused to accept an assignment in Brazil.
The complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
3Cited by18 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Schwartz v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cockels v. International Business Expositions, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Dahlman v. Oakland UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Horton v. VerhelleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.