Legal Opinion
Matter of Discipline of Hopewell
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1993No. 18103Published
1Opinion of the Court
507 N.W.2d 911 (1993)
In the Matter of the DISCIPLINE OF Richard James HOPEWELL, as an Attorney at Law.
No. 18103.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Argued September 2, 1993.
Decided November 3, 1993.
R. James Zieser, Tyndall, for complainant Disciplinary Bd.
Carleton R. Hoy of Hoy and Hoy, Sioux Falls, for respondent Hopewell.
GILBERTSON, Circuit Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a disciplinary proceeding against Richard Hopewell (Hopewell), a member of the State Bar of South Dakota. For the most part, he has admitted the factual allegations against him. There remains for this Court, the issue of a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ernest N. Morial v. Judiciary Commission of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FadeleyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.