Legal Opinion

Estremado v. Jackson County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1997No. LUBA No. 96-059; CA A95538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s dismissal of their appeal from what they denominate “land use decisions” of Jackson County approving respondent Lowell’s (respondent) site plan and related applications for dwellings in a resource zone. LUBA held that the county’s approvals were issued “in response to a writ of mandamus” under ORS 215.428(7) and, therefore, were not “land use decisions” subject to LUBA’s jurisdiction. ORS 197.015(10)(d)(B). We affirm.

Respondent filed his applications in late 1992. After substantially more than 120 days had elapsed and no final county action had been taken,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lowell v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API