Legal Opinion

Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1994No. LUBA 93-234; CA A80513; SC S40802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this land use case, the issue is whether a stipulation that was entered into as part of a mandamus action in circuit court under ORS 215.428(7) (set out infra) is a “land use decision” that is appealable to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). The Court of Appeals held that the stipulation was appealable to LUBA, as a “de facto land use decision.” Murphy Citizens Advisory Com. v. Josephine County, 123 Or App 539, 543, 860 P2d 857 (1993). We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

In December 1991, Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. (Copeland), filed a “site review…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Flight Shop, Inc. v. Leading Edge Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Flying J, Inc. v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API