Legal Opinion
Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 27, 1995No. LUBA 95-031; CA A90324PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of petitioner’s appeal from Josephine County’s issuance of a permit to respondent Copeland Sand & Gravel (respondent) for an aggregate and asphalt processing operation. We affirm.
Respondent applied for the permit in late 1991. The county failed to act on the application within 120 days, and respondent brought a mandamus proceeding pursuant to ORS 215.428(7). After the issuance of the alternative writ directing the county to grant the permit or show cause, the county and respondent entered into a stipulation whereby the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Russell v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Estremado v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997