Legal Opinion
Christman v. Dravo Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1983No. 55PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal by the appellant, Martha Christman, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (per Judges McGowan and Narick) granting a Mo tion For Summary Judgment on behalf of appellee, Dravo Corporation (hereinafter Dravo or appellee). We affirm.
In this jurisdiction, a ruling on a motion for summary judgment “shall be rendered if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Helinek v. HelinekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rosipal v. Montgomery WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kinloch v. TonseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sutmire v. ANDREWSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Schoffstall v. Nationwide Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.