Legal Opinion

Jarrett v. United States National Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. A8205-02951; CA A46184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. In the first, Jarrett v. U. S. National Bank, 81 Or App 242, 725 P2d 384 (1986), we held that U.S. National Bank (Bank) had breached its duty as trustee in permitting a lessee to renew its lease of trust property at below market rent and remanded for a determination of damages. On remand, the trial court determined damages without taking further evidence, and Bank appeals. We reverse and remand.

We summarize the facts as we described them in our former opinion. Paul Schatz, Sr., was the settlor of an inter vivos trust. Under the terms of the trust, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Stephan v. Equitable Savings and Loan AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Ross v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Marston v. MYERS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robertson v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API