Legal Opinion
Askey v. C. & M. Service, M. T. Miller, Coldway Carriers, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 9555PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FOLLMER, District Judge.
The above case comes before the court on defendants’ motion for an order re*243quiring the insurer from whom plaintiff received Workmen’s Compensation and property damage to be joined as a party plaintiff under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Nos. 21 and 17(a). Defendants have since withdrawn their request to join Continental National American Group on the basis of their subrogated interest under the New York Workmen’s Compensation Law.
This action arises out of an alleged accident which occurred between two tractor-trailer trucks on August 19, 1964, on U.S.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Public Service Company of Oklahoma, a Domestic Corporation v. Black & Veatch, Consulting Engineers, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Wattles v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979