Legal Opinion
Piggott v. Borough of Hopewell
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 8, 1952PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 106 (1952)
91 A.2d 667
ROBERT PIGGOTT, ELIZABETH PIGGOTT, SAMUEL E. COPNER, HELEN COPNER, HARRY G. HALL, JEANETTE HALL, ERNEST H. ADLER AND ELIZABETH ADLER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BOROUGH OF HOPEWELL, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF HOPEWELL, COUNTY OF MERCER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND ALLEN B. COX, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 8, 1952.
Mr. John A. Waldron and Mr. John Palaschak, Jr., attorneys for the plaintiffs.
Mr. David L. Smith, attorney for the defendants.
WOODS,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of DunellenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- State v. CraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1873
- Bennett v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Waikiki Resort Hotel, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sugarloaf Citizens Assoc., Inc. v. GudisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Zell v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.