Legal Opinion
Zell v. Borough of Roseland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 15, 1956PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 N.J. Super. 75 (1956)
125 A.2d 890
ALICE SWAIN ZELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOROUGH OF ROSELAND, THE HALF DIME SAVINGS BANK, THE ROSELAND METHODIST PROTESTANT CHURCH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 5, 1956.
Decided October 15, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Roy J. Grimley argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.
Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Roseland, et al.; Messrs. Brandley & Brandley and Mr. Walter G.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ajamian v. SchlangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of DunellenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Cobble Close Farm v. Bd. of Adjustment, Middletown Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- Hasbrouck Heights Hospital Ass'n v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- LaRue v. TP. OF EAST BRUNSWICKNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Richard Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (073142)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.