Legal Opinion
In re P.D.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 1995No. Nos. 92-FS-438, 92-FS-439, 92-FS-585, and 92-FS-593PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court by Associate Judge STEADMAN.
Separate statement by Senior Judge MACK at 340.
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
C.D. and De.D. appeal from a trial court order terminating their parental rights with respect to their daughters, P.D. and D.D. The following arguments are made on appeal with respect to the proceeding before the trial court: (1) the mother did not receive the statutorily required notice for the termination hearing, (2) the decision to terminate appellants’ parental rights was not supported by clear and convincing evidence, and (3) the guardian ad litem did not have the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Stamenich v. MarkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re C.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re T.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re CTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re THDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re TMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.