Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Baker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 2004No. 1000999Published

1Dissent

"`Hearsay evidence is testimony in court, or written evidence, of a statement made out of court, the statement being offered as an assertion to show the truth of matters asserted therein, and thus resting for its value upon the credibility of the out-of-court asserter.' Edward W. Cleary, McCormick on Evidence 584 (1972). Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by the Alabama Rules of Evidence or by other rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Alabama or by statute. Ala.R.Evid. 802. Hearsay is not admissible because it violates the right of confrontation and cross-examination guaranteed by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ex Parte WhisenhantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API