Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. Allen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BURGER, Circuit Judge.
From an adverse decision in the Patent Office, appellee invoked the jurisdiction of the District Court under 35 U.S.C. § 145, where the issue of patentability of his invention was tried de novo. The District Court rejected Patent Office claims that the invention had been in non-experimental public use, and authorized the Patent Office to issue a patent.
A person is not entitled to a patent where “the invention was * * * in public use * * * more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent. * * * ”1 An exception to this is recognized and “public use” is no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- James C. Hobbs v. United States of America, Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Geo Vann, Inc., Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Anthony J. Cali v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.