Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2006No. 2005-1531PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, George Bernard Quatman of Lima, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0008117, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1972.

{¶ 2} On August 9, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct. Respondent filed an answer to the complaint, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline held a hearing on the complaint in May 2005. With one member dissenting, the panel then prepared written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation, all of which the board adopted.

Misconduct

{¶ 3} According to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. LockshinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. BurkholderOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. ParisOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API