Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Bueter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 2006No. 29A02-0510-CV-980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Plaintiffs, Sandra and Mark Brinkman (collectively, the Brinkmans), appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees-Defen-dants, Anne P. Bueter, M.D. (Dr. Bueter), James F. Dupler, M.D. (Dr. Dupler), and Women's Health Partnership (WHP) (collectively, the Physicians).

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

ISSUES

The Brinkmans raise three issues on appeal, which we restate as:(1) Whether the two-year statute of limitations for actions brought under the Medical Malpractice Act violates the Indiana constitution…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Benefiel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Havens v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bunch v. TiwariIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. BueterIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brinkman v. BueterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API