Legal Opinion
Worsley Companies v. Town of Mount Pleasant
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 22, 2000No. 25070PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
Appellant brought this action alleging a temporary regulatory taking and denial of substantive due process. The circuit court granted respondents summary judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1986, appellant Worsley Companies (Worsley) built a Scotchman on a tract of land (Tract B) leased from Daniel and Mildred Hall (Halls). Worsley constructed a sewer line across an adjacent tract of land (Tract A), which the Halls also owned, and connected it to Town of Mount Pleasant’s (Town’s) sewer system. This sewer line was never dedicated or otherwise transferred to Town or Mount Pleasant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of DarienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Scott v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- RRI Realty Corp. v. Incorporated Village of SouthamptonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Sunset Cay, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n v. City of North Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.