Legal Opinion

Dickenson v. Belt Automobile Indemnity Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1923No. Appeal, 115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiff’s action is on a contract of indemnity on a second-hand automobile; the risk covered inter alia loss by theft; the maximum liability of the defendant on such a risk being 80% of the purchase price paid by the insured therefor with a reduction of 2% per month thereafter of the purchase price during the continuance of the insurance. The plaintiff stated in his application that he paid for the automobile, with the spare tire and tube thereto attached, the sum of $1,412.50. It was provided in the contract of indemnity that it should be void “if the subscriber…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wall v. Royal Society of Good FellowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wessling v. LatkanichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hepburn v. Schwartz Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Potter v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Squire v. Simon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API