Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the Minneapolis & St. Louis By. Co., impleaded with the Northern Pacific B. Co., from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Brill, J., presiding, overruling its separate demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtDicKinson, J.
Appeal by the Minneapolis & St. Louis Bailway Company from an order overruling its demurrer to the complaint. The complaint is sufficient to charge the appellant company with negligence, and to show a right of recovery against it. It is alleged that, while the plaintiff’s intestate was a passenger upon a train of the Northern Pacific Company, he was killed in a collision of that train with a train of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Company, running in the opposite direction, and that the collision was caused by the negligent manner of the operation of both trains. It is particularly alleged that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Colegrove v. New York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Cuddy v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Slater v. . MersereauNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Waylander-Peterson Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.