Legal Opinion
City of Houston v. Flaniken
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided June 5, 2003No. 14-02-01210-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.
The City of Houston and its employee, John Norris, file this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment asserting immunity in Lois Flaniken’s traffic collision suit. Flaniken claimed immunity was waived by the Texas Tort Claims Act, as she alleged Norris operated a city ambulance negligently. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 101.021(1). We have jurisdiction on this interlocutory appeal of that part of the motion for summary judgment based on official immunity. See Id. § 51.014(5); City of Houston v. Kilburn, 849…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Wadewitz v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Dolcefino v. Randolph, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- City of Houston v. KilburnTexas Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of San Angelo Fire Department v. Hudson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- City of Austin, Texas v. Librada Albarran, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- City of Austin, Texas v. Librada Albarran, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- City of San Angelo Fire Department and Kelly Hood v. Sheila Hudson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- City of San Angelo Fire Department and Kelly Hood v. Sheila Hudson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.