Grooms v. Walden Security

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BELINDA MARY GROOMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) NO. 3:21-cv-00363 ) v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) WALDEN SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24, “Motion”), supported by a Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 25, “Memorandum in Support”). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to the Motion, (Doc. No. 27, “Response”), and Defendant replied (Doc. No. 28, “Reply”). Plaintiff alleges that she was discriminated against by her employer because of her…