Preston v. Knapp
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of "Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This action was commenced against Sewell Knapp, in his lifetime, to recover $493.81 for goods sold and delivered to him by 1.1ST. Miller, the latter having assigned his demand to the plaintiff. After having answered, denying the sale and delivery of the goods and his indebtedness to Miller, Sewell Knapp died, and his executrix, Caroline Knapp, was regularly substituted as defendant, on motion of defendant’s counsel. The case was tried by the court on the original pleadings, it being expressly admitted by the defendant on the trial that the claim had been presented to the executrix…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hentsch v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Drake v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by21 opinions
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Satterfield v. GarmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.