Legal Opinion

Preston v. Knapp

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1890No. 13549PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of "Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This action was commenced against Sewell Knapp, in his lifetime, to recover $493.81 for goods sold and delivered to him by 1.1ST. Miller, the latter having assigned his demand to the plaintiff. After having answered, denying the sale and delivery of the goods and his indebtedness to Miller, Sewell Knapp died, and his executrix, Caroline Knapp, was regularly substituted as defendant, on motion of defendant’s counsel. The case was tried by the court on the original pleadings, it being expressly admitted by the defendant on the trial that the claim had been presented to the executrix…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hentsch v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Drake v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Satterfield v. GarmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API