People v. Dempster
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
The appellant was charged by an information in two counts with having embezzled the sum of fourteen hundred dollars and sixteen hundred dollars, respectively. During the course of the trial the judge pointed out to counsel that the commitment of the magistrate was for theft instead of embezzlement. The district attorney thereupon moved the court for leave to amend the information by substituting the words “grand theft” for that of “embezzlement, charging the defendant with the crime of grand theft, a felony instead of embezzlement” and changing the language of the charge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. ThalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. ManchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Leonard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935