Legal Opinion

Kanotex Refining Co. v. Bonifield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 15, 1919No. 9322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Woodward County; J. C. Robberts, Judge. Action by S. Bonifield against the Kano-tex Refining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

On the 24th day of June, 1915, defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $2,800 as damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff while engaged as an employe of defendant.

Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas, and as such corporation was engaged in doing business in this state on the date that the injuries complained of were received by plaintiff. On the 28th day of June, 1913, defendant had an oil tank located at Laverne,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Pilkinton v. Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Southwest Improvement Co. v. AndrewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Whitehead v. GormleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Stout v. SchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API