Legal Opinion
Whitehead v. Gormley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1926No. 15221PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
In this opinion Earl Gormley will be designated as plaintiff, J. E. Whitehead as defendant, the First National Bank as the bank, and the inter-vener, Osage Oil & Refining Company, as “the company.”
On October 3, 1922, plaintiff filed his action against the defendant and the bank and the petition alleges that on March 15, 1918, plaintiff deposited with the bank “Certificate No. 301, for 6,000 shares of the capital stock ctf the Osage O. and R. Co. ” ; that the certificate was unindorsed and was to be held by the bank until January 2,1919, and was to be returned to plaintiff,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burr v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Elson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- State v. LonewolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gergens v. McCollumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Slack v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Lowney v. KnottSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956
- Kirkpatrick v. Jacobson's Lifetime Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Red Eagle v. FreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Shewmake v. ShifflettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.