Legal Opinion

Interstate Motor Freight System v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided July 21, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 5047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, District Judge.

This is an action to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission in No. MC-F-8265, Interstate Motor Freight System-Purchases-Eaton Truck Line, Inc., denying plaintiff’s application to purchase operating rights of Eaton Truck Line, Inc. The action is brought *870in this judicial district to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1398(a).1.

Plaintiff Interstate Motor Freight System (hereafter termed “Interstate”) conducts extensive operations as a motor carrier over a wide area of the continental United States. Its operating authority before leasing of the Eaton rights had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Boston and Maine Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arrow Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Keller Industries, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, National Motor, Freight Traffic Association, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Hill v. KennedyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API