Curry v. State

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was tried and convicted for seduction and his punishment assessed at the lowest prescribed by law. This is the second appeal. The decision on the first is reported in 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 262, 151 S. W. Rep., 319.

Appellant contends the case should be reversed on three grounds. First, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. Second, because of the State being permitted to ask appellant’s witness Stephenson certain questions on cross-examination. And third, because of questions propounded by the State to appellant’s witness Dwiggins.…